2025 Dell Pro Max 18 Plus: Building the Perfect BEAST

The video takes a deep dive into the newly launched Dell Pro Max 18 Plus, a device that Dell clearly wants to position as a direct competitor to other high-end “Pro Max” devices on the market. From the moment the review begins, it’s obvious that Dell is experimenting with more than just specs, it’s trying to reshape how people see its brand in the premium space. The YouTuber points out that while Dell has traditionally been seen as a safe, reliable laptop and desktop brand, the “18 Plus” experiment is Dell stepping into flashy territory.

📝 Video Summary

Design & Build Quality:

• Dell clearly tried to mirror that sleek, industrial look that’s become the standard in premium devices.
• The 18-inch display is massive, but it comes with the downside of weight and portability.
• The build feels sturdy, though a bit boxier compared to its competitors.

Display & Visuals:

• The screen shines with sharp resolution and accurate colors, perfect for content creators or binge-watchers.
• However, the bezels still look slightly thicker than what you’d expect in 2025.

Performance & Power:

• Runs on the latest Intel chip with high-end graphics integration.
• Handles multitasking, editing, and even heavy gaming without breaking a sweat.
• The reviewer noted that thermal management was surprisingly solid given the size.

Battery Life:

• This is where the excitement fizzles a bit the battery doesn’t live up to the “Pro Max” promise.
• Heavy users will likely be chained to a charger after a few hours of intense work.

Unique Features:

• Comes with an upgraded speaker system, making it ideal for entertainment.
• Enhanced webcam and AI-assisted noise cancellation for video calls.
• Dell seems to be chasing the “premium lifestyle laptop” identity here, not just raw performance.

Price Point:

• At its listed price, the Dell Pro Max 18 Plus is dangerously close to Apple’s territory.
• The reviewer questions whether Dell’s brand reputation in this segment is strong enough to justify the tag.

The Dell Pro Max 18 Plus is a giant, stylish laptop with a stunning screen and strong performance, but the battery gives up too quickly when it’s not plugged in. It delivers sharp visuals, loud and clear sound, and even makes you look better on video calls, but its high price tag makes you stop and wonder if Dell has done enough to truly compete with Apple in the premium space. By Apple we mean the Mac Book.

💡 My Thoughts

Honestly, this device feels like Dell’s attempt at breaking into a conversation it hasn’t always been part of. People don’t usually associate Dell with the flashy “Pro Max” crowd (all HP, Macbook etc) Dell has always been that safe, dependable laptop you find in offices and classrooms. But with this, it feels like they’re saying: “Hey, we can be cool too.”

That said, I think Dell should have leaned harder into its strengths. The build and performance are solid, but the battery life is a clear letdown. And while the huge 18-inch screen is impressive, it limits portability. It’s almost as if Dell tried to check all the boxes without asking if this was really what their users wanted. Though I am not a Dell fan (yes I prefer HP) but I feel they did their best. Perhaps they could take the downsides of this version into consideration before they produce another one.

💬 Final Thoughts

The Dell Pro Max 18 Plus isn’t a bad device at all in fact, it’s one of Dell’s boldest moves in years. The design looks good, the performance is top-notch, and the display is absolutely stunning. But when you attach a “Pro Max” label, expectations skyrocket. And on some of those fronts like battery life and true portability Dell falls short.

If you’re a loyal Dell user who has been waiting for something premium and powerful, this might feel like a dream machine. But if you’re just shopping in the high-end market, it’s hard to ignore how much competition there is at the same price point.

At the end of the day, Dell deserves credit for trying something different, but whether it convinces people to put it in the same conversation as Apple or HP or remains to be seen.

2025 Dell Pro Max 18 Plus: Building the Perfect BEAST

The video takes a deep dive into the newly launched Dell Pro Max 18 Plus, a device that Dell clearly wants to position as a direct competitor to other high-end “Pro Max” devices on the market. From the moment the review begins, it’s obvious that Dell is experimenting with more than just specs, it’s trying to reshape how people see its brand in the premium space. The YouTuber points out that while Dell has traditionally been seen as a safe, reliable laptop and desktop brand, the “18 Plus” experiment is Dell stepping into flashy territory.

📝 Video Summary

Design & Build Quality:

• Dell clearly tried to mirror that sleek, industrial look that’s become the standard in premium devices.
• The 18-inch display is massive, but it comes with the downside of weight and portability.
• The build feels sturdy, though a bit boxier compared to its competitors.

Display & Visuals:

• The screen shines with sharp resolution and accurate colors, perfect for content creators or binge-watchers.
• However, the bezels still look slightly thicker than what you’d expect in 2025.

Performance & Power:

• Runs on the latest Intel chip with high-end graphics integration.
• Handles multitasking, editing, and even heavy gaming without breaking a sweat.
• The reviewer noted that thermal management was surprisingly solid given the size.

Battery Life:

• This is where the excitement fizzles a bit the battery doesn’t live up to the “Pro Max” promise.
• Heavy users will likely be chained to a charger after a few hours of intense work.

Unique Features:

• Comes with an upgraded speaker system, making it ideal for entertainment.
• Enhanced webcam and AI-assisted noise cancellation for video calls.
• Dell seems to be chasing the “premium lifestyle laptop” identity here, not just raw performance.

Price Point:

• At its listed price, the Dell Pro Max 18 Plus is dangerously close to Apple’s territory.
• The reviewer questions whether Dell’s brand reputation in this segment is strong enough to justify the tag.

The Dell Pro Max 18 Plus is a giant, stylish laptop with a stunning screen and strong performance, but the battery gives up too quickly when it’s not plugged in. It delivers sharp visuals, loud and clear sound, and even makes you look better on video calls, but its high price tag makes you stop and wonder if Dell has done enough to truly compete with Apple in the premium space. By Apple we mean the Mac Book.

💡 My Thoughts

Honestly, this device feels like Dell’s attempt at breaking into a conversation it hasn’t always been part of. People don’t usually associate Dell with the flashy “Pro Max” crowd (all HP, Macbook etc) Dell has always been that safe, dependable laptop you find in offices and classrooms. But with this, it feels like they’re saying: “Hey, we can be cool too.”

That said, I think Dell should have leaned harder into its strengths. The build and performance are solid, but the battery life is a clear letdown. And while the huge 18-inch screen is impressive, it limits portability. It’s almost as if Dell tried to check all the boxes without asking if this was really what their users wanted. Though I am not a Dell fan (yes I prefer HP) but I feel they did their best. Perhaps they could take the downsides of this version into consideration before they produce another one.

💬 Final Thoughts

The Dell Pro Max 18 Plus isn’t a bad device at all in fact, it’s one of Dell’s boldest moves in years. The design looks good, the performance is top-notch, and the display is absolutely stunning. But when you attach a “Pro Max” label, expectations skyrocket. And on some of those fronts like battery life and true portability Dell falls short.

If you’re a loyal Dell user who has been waiting for something premium and powerful, this might feel like a dream machine. But if you’re just shopping in the high-end market, it’s hard to ignore how much competition there is at the same price point.

At the end of the day, Dell deserves credit for trying something different, but whether it convinces people to put it in the same conversation as Apple or HP or remains to be seen.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review - Apple are you seeing this!?

The video dives into Xiaomi’s newest flagship, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, and it’s clear from the very first frame that Xiaomi isn’t shy about taking a few pages from Apple’s playbook. From the naming scheme to the design language, the resemblance to the iPhone 17 lineup is more than a little obvious. But the twist here is that Xiaomi isn’t just copying, they're adding some seriously bold and unique features that might even outshine the iPhone in certain areas.

Instead of being “the cheaper lookalike,” this device tries to prove that Xiaomi is ready to step onto the big stage as a serious rival. And honestly, it makes you pause and ask: if I can get all these features here, do I really need to spend double the money on an iPhone?

📝 Video Summary

• Design & Build: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max comes in sleek colors, slim bezels, and a solid premium build. Basically, it’s the kind of phone you’d proudly slam on the table during lunch just so people notice.
• Display: A bright, smooth AMOLED display that makes scrolling TikTok or Instagram feel buttery soft. If your old phone lags while you doom-scroll, this one’s an instant upgrade.
• Camera: Strong camera setup with detailed photos and crisp selfies. Great for when you “accidentally” take 20 shots of your food before actually eating it.
• Performance: Powered by a Snapdragon chip that keeps everything fast whether you’re gaming, multitasking, or pretending to multitask while really just watching Netflix.
• Battery Life: Solid all-day battery with fast charging. Think: you plug it in for a quick shower, and by the time you’re done, it’s almost full.
• Extras: Features like 5G, stereo speakers, and decent software polish round it up into a complete package. (Good for a movie night when your laptop battery is down)

💡 My Thoughts

Honestly, I laughed when I first saw this. Xiaomi has basically said, “Hey Apple, nice phone, we'll take it from here.” On one hand, it looks like blatant imitation; on the other hand, it’s hard to be upset when the execution is this smooth. That second screen? It could’ve been a tacky gimmick, but the fact that it matches the front panel’s quality and has thoughtful software touches makes it genuinely interesting. It’s almost like having a smartwatch built into your phone’s back. Do I need it? Probably not. Do I secretly want it? Absolutely, yes.

I also appreciate that Xiaomi didn’t sacrifice the essentials just to make a flashy trick work. The battery is strong, the cameras deliver, and the performance is snappy. That balance is something many “big brand” flagships sometimes forget.

💬 Final Thoughts

At the end of the day, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is not so much an "Apple copycat" and more of a declaration. It combines top-end looks with practical features that truly matter good cameras, excellent battery life, and robust performance. All these are basically what we all need in a phone. The second screen might elicit mixed reactions, but it means that Xiaomi is at least breaking the mold rather than playing safe. For anyone looking for something different beyond the usual Apple vs. Samsung mix, this phone is proof that Xiaomi can finally stand on its own.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review - Apple are you seeing this!?

The video dives into Xiaomi’s newest flagship, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, and it’s clear from the very first frame that Xiaomi isn’t shy about taking a few pages from Apple’s playbook. From the naming scheme to the design language, the resemblance to the iPhone 17 lineup is more than a little obvious. But the twist here is that Xiaomi isn’t just copying, they're adding some seriously bold and unique features that might even outshine the iPhone in certain areas.

Instead of being “the cheaper lookalike,” this device tries to prove that Xiaomi is ready to step onto the big stage as a serious rival. And honestly, it makes you pause and ask: if I can get all these features here, do I really need to spend double the money on an iPhone?

📝 Video Summary

• Design & Build: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max comes in sleek colors, slim bezels, and a solid premium build. Basically, it’s the kind of phone you’d proudly slam on the table during lunch just so people notice.
• Display: A bright, smooth AMOLED display that makes scrolling TikTok or Instagram feel buttery soft. If your old phone lags while you doom-scroll, this one’s an instant upgrade.
• Camera: Strong camera setup with detailed photos and crisp selfies. Great for when you “accidentally” take 20 shots of your food before actually eating it.
• Performance: Powered by a Snapdragon chip that keeps everything fast whether you’re gaming, multitasking, or pretending to multitask while really just watching Netflix.
• Battery Life: Solid all-day battery with fast charging. Think: you plug it in for a quick shower, and by the time you’re done, it’s almost full.
• Extras: Features like 5G, stereo speakers, and decent software polish round it up into a complete package. (Good for a movie night when your laptop battery is down)

💡 My Thoughts

Honestly, I laughed when I first saw this. Xiaomi has basically said, “Hey Apple, nice phone, we'll take it from here.” On one hand, it looks like blatant imitation; on the other hand, it’s hard to be upset when the execution is this smooth. That second screen? It could’ve been a tacky gimmick, but the fact that it matches the front panel’s quality and has thoughtful software touches makes it genuinely interesting. It’s almost like having a smartwatch built into your phone’s back. Do I need it? Probably not. Do I secretly want it? Absolutely, yes.

I also appreciate that Xiaomi didn’t sacrifice the essentials just to make a flashy trick work. The battery is strong, the cameras deliver, and the performance is snappy. That balance is something many “big brand” flagships sometimes forget.

💬 Final Thoughts

At the end of the day, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is not so much an "Apple copycat" and more of a declaration. It combines top-end looks with practical features that truly matter good cameras, excellent battery life, and robust performance. All these are basically what we all need in a phone. The second screen might elicit mixed reactions, but it means that Xiaomi is at least breaking the mold rather than playing safe. For anyone looking for something different beyond the usual Apple vs. Samsung mix, this phone is proof that Xiaomi can finally stand on its own.

HP's $179 Laptop 14 Review

Upgrading laptops usually means spending hundreds of dollars, but sometimes the cheapest option can surprise you. In this review, Lon Sidman takes a look at the HP Laptop 14, one of the most affordable Windows laptops on the market right now, priced at just $180. At first glance, you’d expect it to be slow, flimsy, and barely usable, but what makes it interesting is how much value you can squeeze out of it with a few simple upgrades.

📝 Video Summary

• Priced at just $180, making it one of the cheapest retail Windows laptops.
• Runs on an Intel N150 quad-core processor with 4GB RAM and 128GB UFS storage by default.
• Easy to open and upgrade: supports up to 16GB RAM and has an empty NVMe SSD slot for faster storage.
• Display is the main drawback: 720p TN panel with low brightness and poor color accuracy.
• Build quality is modest plastic but decent, weighing about 3 pounds.
• The keyboard is springy, the trackpad feels spongy but usable; no biometric login options.
• With upgraded RAM, it can smoothly handle web browsing, Office tasks, and 1080p 60fps video playback.
• Gaming is limited but possible. GTA 5 runs 30fps at 720p low, PS2 emulation works at near full speed. (I love GTA games, this is a cool laptop)
• Game streaming (GeForce Now) works well thanks to solid Wi-Fi 6 connectivity.
• Linux dual-boot runs great, making it versatile for open-source or server use.
• The battery lasts 5 to 6 hours under light use.

In simple terms, this laptop is cheap but surprisingly capable if you’re willing to upgrade it a little. Out of the box, it’s not super fast. Think of it like buying instant noodles, it’ll fill you up, but it gets much better if you add eggs, veggies, and seasoning. The upgrades (more RAM and faster storage) make a huge difference, turning it from “just okay” to “actually good.” The biggest weakness is the screen, which looks dull and washed out, so don’t expect Netflix to look amazing. But for basic stuff like browsing, typing documents, streaming games, or even some light gaming with the right tweaks, it holds up. In short: it’s a budget-friendly option that punches above its weight if you give it a little boost.

💡 My Thoughts

I think what makes this laptop so interesting is the upgrade path. Out of the box, 4GB of RAM on Windows is almost unusable, it feels sluggish and frustrating. But with a quick RAM upgrade and an SSD, it transforms into a completely different machine, almost like buying a mid-tier laptop for half the price. For anyone comfortable with unscrewing a few panels, that’s a huge win.

The display is clearly the weakest part. At 720p with poor colors and brightness, it’s not going to impress anyone, especially if you care about visuals. But for people who mostly use their laptop for browsing, emails, video calls, or typing documents, the screen does the job. Plus, the webcam having a physical shutter is a nice touch for privacy.

I also like that HP didn’t lock down the system. So many cheap laptops are designed to be disposable, with soldered memory and no upgrade options. This one feels like it actually respects the user, giving you the freedom to extend its lifespan. The fact that Linux runs so well here is the cherry on top for anyone wanting flexibility. The fact I can play GTA 5 on this is even making me want to get it right now.

💬 Final Thoughts

The HP Laptop 14 isn’t perfect, and it isn’t pretending to be. The display is weak, and 4GB RAM out of the box is borderline unusable. But the ability to upgrade RAM and add an SSD makes it a hidden gem in the budget space. It’s light, decently built, and powerful enough for everyday tasks once upgraded. For students, casual users, or anyone on a tight budget, this is a surprisingly capable little machine. If you’re willing to tinker a bit, this $180 laptop can easily punch above its weight.

HP's $179 Laptop 14 Review

Upgrading laptops usually means spending hundreds of dollars, but sometimes the cheapest option can surprise you. In this review, Lon Sidman takes a look at the HP Laptop 14, one of the most affordable Windows laptops on the market right now, priced at just $180. At first glance, you’d expect it to be slow, flimsy, and barely usable, but what makes it interesting is how much value you can squeeze out of it with a few simple upgrades.

📝 Video Summary

• Priced at just $180, making it one of the cheapest retail Windows laptops.
• Runs on an Intel N150 quad-core processor with 4GB RAM and 128GB UFS storage by default.
• Easy to open and upgrade: supports up to 16GB RAM and has an empty NVMe SSD slot for faster storage.
• Display is the main drawback: 720p TN panel with low brightness and poor color accuracy.
• Build quality is modest plastic but decent, weighing about 3 pounds.
• The keyboard is springy, the trackpad feels spongy but usable; no biometric login options.
• With upgraded RAM, it can smoothly handle web browsing, Office tasks, and 1080p 60fps video playback.
• Gaming is limited but possible. GTA 5 runs 30fps at 720p low, PS2 emulation works at near full speed. (I love GTA games, this is a cool laptop)
• Game streaming (GeForce Now) works well thanks to solid Wi-Fi 6 connectivity.
• Linux dual-boot runs great, making it versatile for open-source or server use.
• The battery lasts 5 to 6 hours under light use.

In simple terms, this laptop is cheap but surprisingly capable if you’re willing to upgrade it a little. Out of the box, it’s not super fast. Think of it like buying instant noodles, it’ll fill you up, but it gets much better if you add eggs, veggies, and seasoning. The upgrades (more RAM and faster storage) make a huge difference, turning it from “just okay” to “actually good.” The biggest weakness is the screen, which looks dull and washed out, so don’t expect Netflix to look amazing. But for basic stuff like browsing, typing documents, streaming games, or even some light gaming with the right tweaks, it holds up. In short: it’s a budget-friendly option that punches above its weight if you give it a little boost.

💡 My Thoughts

I think what makes this laptop so interesting is the upgrade path. Out of the box, 4GB of RAM on Windows is almost unusable, it feels sluggish and frustrating. But with a quick RAM upgrade and an SSD, it transforms into a completely different machine, almost like buying a mid-tier laptop for half the price. For anyone comfortable with unscrewing a few panels, that’s a huge win.

The display is clearly the weakest part. At 720p with poor colors and brightness, it’s not going to impress anyone, especially if you care about visuals. But for people who mostly use their laptop for browsing, emails, video calls, or typing documents, the screen does the job. Plus, the webcam having a physical shutter is a nice touch for privacy.

I also like that HP didn’t lock down the system. So many cheap laptops are designed to be disposable, with soldered memory and no upgrade options. This one feels like it actually respects the user, giving you the freedom to extend its lifespan. The fact that Linux runs so well here is the cherry on top for anyone wanting flexibility. The fact I can play GTA 5 on this is even making me want to get it right now.

💬 Final Thoughts

The HP Laptop 14 isn’t perfect, and it isn’t pretending to be. The display is weak, and 4GB RAM out of the box is borderline unusable. But the ability to upgrade RAM and add an SSD makes it a hidden gem in the budget space. It’s light, decently built, and powerful enough for everyday tasks once upgraded. For students, casual users, or anyone on a tight budget, this is a surprisingly capable little machine. If you’re willing to tinker a bit, this $180 laptop can easily punch above its weight.

Is iPhone17 Pro Max the BEST Smartphone for a Busy Day?

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has been put through its paces in a full-day real-world test. From display and design to battery life and camera performance, this review dives into how Apple’s biggest phone of 2025 holds up under everyday use. Spoiler: it feels like Apple is pushing the iPhone toward its absolute peak at least for now. I enjoyed this video because I really want to know what’s up with the iPhone 17 Pro. I heard of the iPhone Air and I do not like it. Let’s see how this one performs.

📝 Video Summary

• The phone debuts in a new cosmic orange color that looks surprisingly premium and durable.
• Design highlights include a unibody aluminum build with a glass section for wireless charging and MagSafe, plus a redesigned camera module that allows for a larger battery.
• The display is a showstopper: 3,000 nits peak brightness outdoors, with a new reflective coating that reduces glare and makes it easy to see in direct sunlight.
• The main wide camera remains reliable across different subjects, while the telephoto lens now offers 4x and 8x zoom, producing sharper, less noisy shots.
• The ultra-wide camera excels at macro photography and low-light conditions, making it more useful in tricky scenarios.
• For video, Apple introduces ProRes RAW with OpenGate mode, which uses the full sensor for more framing flexibility (though stabilization is lost in this mode).
• The front camera adds Center Stage for auto-framing, a wider field of view, and improved stabilization, making it great for video calls and horizontal video.
• Battery life held strong even under heavy outdoor use, with the phone still at 8% after hours of 3,000-nit brightness and 4K video shooting.
• Fast charging: up to 50% in 20 minutes, which is impressive given the size of the battery.

In plain English, this phone is basically Apple saying, “fine, have it all.” The new design makes it sturdier and gives room for a bigger battery, so it lasts longer without dying halfway through the day. The screen is crazy bright, you’ll actually be able to see it under the sun without squinting like you’re decoding Morse code. The cameras? They’re sharper, more stable, and better in dark places, plus you can zoom in way further without your photos looking like they were taken on a potato. And that fast charging means you can plug it in for 20 minutes and get enough juice to survive the rest of your night. In short: it’s not about flashy gimmicks, it’s about making everyday use smoother, sharper, and a whole lot less frustrating.

💡 My Thoughts

Honestly, this feels like Apple giving the iPhone everything it’s got. The display brightness alone is wild 3,000 nits basically means you can check your texts while standing inside the sun. The reflective coating makes it even better, finally addressing years of people shielding their phones with a hand like a visor.

The camera upgrades are practical rather than gimmicky. The jump to 8x zoom instead of 5x is a bold move, and while some people might miss the old sweet spot, the extra flexibility is hard to complain about. I also really like how the ultra-wide is no longer just “the fun lens” but actually works well in low light and close-ups.

ProRes RAW with OpenGate is clearly for professionals, and I respect that Apple is leaning into creators. But let’s be real, most people are not out here rigging up stabilizers for their TikToks. It’s still great to have the option, though. (I use my Tiktok once in a while)

Battery life might be the quiet hero here. Lasting through a full day of brutal testing and still hanging on at 8% is no joke. Plus, 50% in 20 minutes? That’s the kind of speed you need when you realize your phone is dying right before heading out.

One minor thing, a question to Apple: Can we get the iPhone 17 Pro Max in different colors? Not just orange color.

💬 Final Thoughts

The iPhone 17 Pro Max feels like a “peak iPhone” moment: premium design, insane display, smarter cameras, and genuinely strong battery life. It’s not just an incremental update; it’s Apple flexing every muscle at once. If you’re coming from an older Pro Max, you’ll notice the difference. And if you’re wondering whether Apple has anywhere left to go, well… so is the reviewer. For now, though, this might be as close to the perfect iPhone as it gets.

Is iPhone17 Pro Max the BEST Smartphone for a Busy Day?

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has been put through its paces in a full-day real-world test. From display and design to battery life and camera performance, this review dives into how Apple’s biggest phone of 2025 holds up under everyday use. Spoiler: it feels like Apple is pushing the iPhone toward its absolute peak at least for now. I enjoyed this video because I really want to know what’s up with the iPhone 17 Pro. I heard of the iPhone Air and I do not like it. Let’s see how this one performs.

📝 Video Summary

• The phone debuts in a new cosmic orange color that looks surprisingly premium and durable.
• Design highlights include a unibody aluminum build with a glass section for wireless charging and MagSafe, plus a redesigned camera module that allows for a larger battery.
• The display is a showstopper: 3,000 nits peak brightness outdoors, with a new reflective coating that reduces glare and makes it easy to see in direct sunlight.
• The main wide camera remains reliable across different subjects, while the telephoto lens now offers 4x and 8x zoom, producing sharper, less noisy shots.
• The ultra-wide camera excels at macro photography and low-light conditions, making it more useful in tricky scenarios.
• For video, Apple introduces ProRes RAW with OpenGate mode, which uses the full sensor for more framing flexibility (though stabilization is lost in this mode).
• The front camera adds Center Stage for auto-framing, a wider field of view, and improved stabilization, making it great for video calls and horizontal video.
• Battery life held strong even under heavy outdoor use, with the phone still at 8% after hours of 3,000-nit brightness and 4K video shooting.
• Fast charging: up to 50% in 20 minutes, which is impressive given the size of the battery.

In plain English, this phone is basically Apple saying, “fine, have it all.” The new design makes it sturdier and gives room for a bigger battery, so it lasts longer without dying halfway through the day. The screen is crazy bright, you’ll actually be able to see it under the sun without squinting like you’re decoding Morse code. The cameras? They’re sharper, more stable, and better in dark places, plus you can zoom in way further without your photos looking like they were taken on a potato. And that fast charging means you can plug it in for 20 minutes and get enough juice to survive the rest of your night. In short: it’s not about flashy gimmicks, it’s about making everyday use smoother, sharper, and a whole lot less frustrating.

💡 My Thoughts

Honestly, this feels like Apple giving the iPhone everything it’s got. The display brightness alone is wild 3,000 nits basically means you can check your texts while standing inside the sun. The reflective coating makes it even better, finally addressing years of people shielding their phones with a hand like a visor.

The camera upgrades are practical rather than gimmicky. The jump to 8x zoom instead of 5x is a bold move, and while some people might miss the old sweet spot, the extra flexibility is hard to complain about. I also really like how the ultra-wide is no longer just “the fun lens” but actually works well in low light and close-ups.

ProRes RAW with OpenGate is clearly for professionals, and I respect that Apple is leaning into creators. But let’s be real, most people are not out here rigging up stabilizers for their TikToks. It’s still great to have the option, though. (I use my Tiktok once in a while)

Battery life might be the quiet hero here. Lasting through a full day of brutal testing and still hanging on at 8% is no joke. Plus, 50% in 20 minutes? That’s the kind of speed you need when you realize your phone is dying right before heading out.

One minor thing, a question to Apple: Can we get the iPhone 17 Pro Max in different colors? Not just orange color.

💬 Final Thoughts

The iPhone 17 Pro Max feels like a “peak iPhone” moment: premium design, insane display, smarter cameras, and genuinely strong battery life. It’s not just an incremental update; it’s Apple flexing every muscle at once. If you’re coming from an older Pro Max, you’ll notice the difference. And if you’re wondering whether Apple has anywhere left to go, well… so is the reviewer. For now, though, this might be as close to the perfect iPhone as it gets.

Why the iPhone 17 is my first new phone in 5 years

Upgrading phones isn’t something most of us do every year. In fact, the creator of this video held onto their iPhone 11 for a full five years before finally making the jump to the iPhone 17. Instead of going all-in on the fancy Pro models or going into the iPhone Air, he chose the base iPhone 17 and after testing it, he feels it’s the best overall choice for most people. The video dives into design, performance, storage, and even small quality of life features, showing how much Apple has changed over those five years.

📝 Video Summary

• The iPhone 17 finally brings the ProMotion display to the base model: smoother, brighter, and way more enjoyable for scrolling or watching videos.
• Apple ditched the physical SIM card slot in some countries, going eSIM-only. Convenient for security and battery space, but not so fun if you’re someone who loves swapping SIMs like Pokémon cards.
• A new quick action button replaces the old silent switch. It’s customizable so instead of just muting, it can open your camera, flashlight, or whatever shortcut you prefer.
• Storage doubled. The base iPhone 17 now comes with 256GB, which feels like Apple finally admitting that 64GB in the iPhone 11 was a cruel joke.
• Battery life is noticeably better, partly because of that freed-up SIM space.
• The selfie camera now has a reframe feature great for group selfies without needing someone to risk life and limb by leaning too far out of frame.
• Price-wise, it’s about the same as last year’s iPhone 16 but packed with Pro-level features, making it surprisingly good value for Apple.

💡 My Thoughts

I really like how this upgrade feels like a “catch-up jump” for people holding onto older phones. Apple’s been slowly rolling out features to the Pro models for years, and now a lot of them have trickled down into the base version. For most users, that’s honestly enough. Unless you’re obsessed with telephoto zoom shots of squirrels or filming cinematic short films, the base iPhone 17 covers 90% of what people actually need.

I also think the eSIM-only move is bold. Sure, it makes sense for design and security, but I can already imagine people at the airport screaming at their phones when their local SIM card doesn’t work. On the bright side, at least you won’t lose those tiny little trays anymore.

The quick action button is probably my favorite change. It feels more practical than the old mute switch. Though, I’ll admit, there’s something satisfying about flicking that toggle and instantly silencing the world. (You have to unsilence again at some point.)

💬 Final Thoughts

The iPhone 17 isn’t flashy like the Pro models, but it’s practical, well-rounded, and a big leap from older iPhones. The display, storage, and battery upgrades alone make it feel like Apple finally remembered that people use their phones for more than just sending iMessages. For anyone still holding onto an iPhone 11 or earlier, this looks like the sweet spot between performance and price. You’re welcome!

Why the iPhone 17 is my first new phone in 5 years

Upgrading phones isn’t something most of us do every year. In fact, the creator of this video held onto their iPhone 11 for a full five years before finally making the jump to the iPhone 17. Instead of going all-in on the fancy Pro models or going into the iPhone Air, he chose the base iPhone 17 and after testing it, he feels it’s the best overall choice for most people. The video dives into design, performance, storage, and even small quality of life features, showing how much Apple has changed over those five years.

📝 Video Summary

• The iPhone 17 finally brings the ProMotion display to the base model: smoother, brighter, and way more enjoyable for scrolling or watching videos.
• Apple ditched the physical SIM card slot in some countries, going eSIM-only. Convenient for security and battery space, but not so fun if you’re someone who loves swapping SIMs like Pokémon cards.
• A new quick action button replaces the old silent switch. It’s customizable so instead of just muting, it can open your camera, flashlight, or whatever shortcut you prefer.
• Storage doubled. The base iPhone 17 now comes with 256GB, which feels like Apple finally admitting that 64GB in the iPhone 11 was a cruel joke.
• Battery life is noticeably better, partly because of that freed-up SIM space.
• The selfie camera now has a reframe feature great for group selfies without needing someone to risk life and limb by leaning too far out of frame.
• Price-wise, it’s about the same as last year’s iPhone 16 but packed with Pro-level features, making it surprisingly good value for Apple.

💡 My Thoughts

I really like how this upgrade feels like a “catch-up jump” for people holding onto older phones. Apple’s been slowly rolling out features to the Pro models for years, and now a lot of them have trickled down into the base version. For most users, that’s honestly enough. Unless you’re obsessed with telephoto zoom shots of squirrels or filming cinematic short films, the base iPhone 17 covers 90% of what people actually need.

I also think the eSIM-only move is bold. Sure, it makes sense for design and security, but I can already imagine people at the airport screaming at their phones when their local SIM card doesn’t work. On the bright side, at least you won’t lose those tiny little trays anymore.

The quick action button is probably my favorite change. It feels more practical than the old mute switch. Though, I’ll admit, there’s something satisfying about flicking that toggle and instantly silencing the world. (You have to unsilence again at some point.)

💬 Final Thoughts

The iPhone 17 isn’t flashy like the Pro models, but it’s practical, well-rounded, and a big leap from older iPhones. The display, storage, and battery upgrades alone make it feel like Apple finally remembered that people use their phones for more than just sending iMessages. For anyone still holding onto an iPhone 11 or earlier, this looks like the sweet spot between performance and price. You’re welcome!

iPhone Air Review: Beauty is Pain

Apple has once again decided to push design boundaries with the iPhone Air, a device that looks almost too good to be real. But here’s the catch, sometimes being slim and beautiful comes at a cost. This video dives into how Apple managed to make the iPhone Air so thin, what compromises were made, and whether this “beauty” is actually worth the “pain.” (Personally, I am not a fan of the iPhone Air)

Video Summary

Design and Engineering

• The iPhone Air gets its ultra-thin profile by squeezing compute, memory, and the logic board into the top half, creating a slight bulge.
• The bottom half is mostly the battery.
• It uses a titanium frame, strong enough to bend and snap back flat.
• Comes with IP68 water/dust resistance and an improved ceramic shield for scratch resistance.

Camera and Display

• Only one rear camera, no zoom or ultrawide options.
• Uses Apple’s Fusion processing for digital 2x crops as a workaround.
• The display can throttle down to 1Hz to save battery.
• The A19 Pro chip is powerful but also capable of underclocking for efficiency.

Connectivity and Battery

• Introduces a new C1X modem chip, comparable in speed and coverage to Qualcomm iPhones.
• eSIM-only worldwide, which saves space for about 200mAh more battery.
• Still, battery life remains one of the main concerns.

The iPhone Air is Apple’s “supermodel” iPhone: thin, sleek, and durable. It sacrifices extra camera lenses and some battery life to stay so slim. Apple used titanium to make sure it doesn’t snap under pressure, but that doesn’t mean you should start bending it for fun. Overall, it’s a phone built for people who value design and portability above all else, even if it means fewer features compared to chunkier models.

My Thoughts

The iPhone Air is Apple’s way of saying, “We can make a phone slimmer than anyone else, and still keep it usable.” And to be fair, the engineering is impressive. The titanium frame, the way it bends and snaps back, that’s straight-up sci-fi level stuff. But here’s the thing: the single camera setup feels like a step backward in 2025. Even budget phones now come with multiple lenses. Apple’s Fusion processing helps, but it’s not the same as having real zoom or ultrawide options. If you care about versatility in photography, this might feel limiting.

Then there’s the eSIM-only decision. Sure, it saves space and adds a bit more battery, but it also kills the flexibility for people who swap SIM cards often. And speaking of the battery, it still seems like a weak point. What’s the point of a gorgeous phone if you’re constantly hunting for a charger?

Final Thoughts

The iPhone Air is a design masterpiece. It’s thin, sleek, and packed with clever engineering. But like the title says: beauty is pain. The compromises: a single camera, eSIM-only, and questionable battery life mean this device isn’t for everyone.

If you love having the slimmest, most futuristic-looking iPhone ever, this will make you happy. But if you want practicality, flexibility, and all-day endurance, you might find yourself longing for Apple’s chunkier models.

iPhone Air Review: Beauty is Pain

Apple has once again decided to push design boundaries with the iPhone Air, a device that looks almost too good to be real. But here’s the catch, sometimes being slim and beautiful comes at a cost. This video dives into how Apple managed to make the iPhone Air so thin, what compromises were made, and whether this “beauty” is actually worth the “pain.” (Personally, I am not a fan of the iPhone Air)

Video Summary

Design and Engineering

• The iPhone Air gets its ultra-thin profile by squeezing compute, memory, and the logic board into the top half, creating a slight bulge.
• The bottom half is mostly the battery.
• It uses a titanium frame, strong enough to bend and snap back flat.
• Comes with IP68 water/dust resistance and an improved ceramic shield for scratch resistance.

Camera and Display

• Only one rear camera, no zoom or ultrawide options.
• Uses Apple’s Fusion processing for digital 2x crops as a workaround.
• The display can throttle down to 1Hz to save battery.
• The A19 Pro chip is powerful but also capable of underclocking for efficiency.

Connectivity and Battery

• Introduces a new C1X modem chip, comparable in speed and coverage to Qualcomm iPhones.
• eSIM-only worldwide, which saves space for about 200mAh more battery.
• Still, battery life remains one of the main concerns.

The iPhone Air is Apple’s “supermodel” iPhone: thin, sleek, and durable. It sacrifices extra camera lenses and some battery life to stay so slim. Apple used titanium to make sure it doesn’t snap under pressure, but that doesn’t mean you should start bending it for fun. Overall, it’s a phone built for people who value design and portability above all else, even if it means fewer features compared to chunkier models.

My Thoughts

The iPhone Air is Apple’s way of saying, “We can make a phone slimmer than anyone else, and still keep it usable.” And to be fair, the engineering is impressive. The titanium frame, the way it bends and snaps back, that’s straight-up sci-fi level stuff. But here’s the thing: the single camera setup feels like a step backward in 2025. Even budget phones now come with multiple lenses. Apple’s Fusion processing helps, but it’s not the same as having real zoom or ultrawide options. If you care about versatility in photography, this might feel limiting.

Then there’s the eSIM-only decision. Sure, it saves space and adds a bit more battery, but it also kills the flexibility for people who swap SIM cards often. And speaking of the battery, it still seems like a weak point. What’s the point of a gorgeous phone if you’re constantly hunting for a charger?

Final Thoughts

The iPhone Air is a design masterpiece. It’s thin, sleek, and packed with clever engineering. But like the title says: beauty is pain. The compromises: a single camera, eSIM-only, and questionable battery life mean this device isn’t for everyone.

If you love having the slimmest, most futuristic-looking iPhone ever, this will make you happy. But if you want practicality, flexibility, and all-day endurance, you might find yourself longing for Apple’s chunkier models.

Does iGPU Beat dGPU? Ryzen Max+ 395 vs RTX 4060 in 25 Games

The big question here is simple: can AMD’s new super-charged integrated graphics (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) actually beat Nvidia’s trusty dedicated GPU, the RTX 4060? Sounds almost ridiculous, right? For years, “integrated graphics” was basically a polite way of saying, “this laptop can maybe handle Solitaire.” But AMD has decided to crash the party with a chip that claims to run modern AAA games smoothly inside a thin 13-inch tablet, no less. The video I watched dives into 25 games tested at both 1080p and 1440p to see if AMD’s iGPU can truly hold its own against a mid-tier dGPU like the 4060. I have always known NVIDIA for their excellent graphics (I'm on team NVIDIA, which is the RTX 4060).

📝 Video Summary

• Setup: AMD’s Ryzen Max+ 395 (inside ASUS Flow Z13) vs Nvidia RTX 4060 (inside Lenovo Legion Slim 5).
• CPU edge: The Z13’s Zen 5 CPU is way ahead of the Legion’s older Zen 4, 60% better multicore, 10% better single core.
• Power limits: RTX 4060 tested at 100W, Z13’s GPU at 75–93W. Jarrod kept it realistic, no “fake fairness.”
• VRAM allocation: AMD’s iGPU can borrow system RAM as VRAM. Testing at 8GB vs 16GB VRAM showed little difference.
  
  VRAM (Video RAM) is basically the graphics card’s own memory space, dedicated to handling visuals. Unlike your computer’s normal RAM that’s shared across everything, VRAM is reserved only for storing images, textures, and details needed to render what you see on screen. In simple terms, it’s like giving your graphics card its own private desk, bigger desks (more VRAM) mean it can handle more detail at once, while smaller desks (less VRAM) mean it has to shuffle things around, which can slow things down.

Game Performances

• Alan Wake 2: AMD sneaks ahead (6 to 8% faster) at 1080p/1440p, though margins are tiny (around 3 FPS). Ray tracing flips the script. Nvidia wins at 1080p, AMD reclaims a narrow win at 1440p.
• Cyberpunk 2077: Dead even at 1080p, AMD has smoother lows at 1440p. But with RT Ultra, 4060 crushes with a 31% lead.
• Spider-Man 2: Biggest surprise — AMD wins in average FPS, but Nvidia feels smoother and looks better thanks to DLSS.
• Stalker 2 & Black Myth: Wukong: Nvidia dominates here, with gaps as wide as 29% at 1080p. Ray tracing especially widens the lead.

💡 Takeaway

In plain English, this means Nvidia’s 4060 is still the more reliable choice for smooth, consistent gaming, especially when fancy graphics like ray tracing are turned on (as I predicted that NVIDIA would win). AMD’s chip, though surprisingly strong for something built into a laptop, only really wins a few niche battles and often falls short in heavy, graphics demanding games.

💭 My Thoughts

Honestly, I didn’t expect AMD’s iGPU to hold its ground this well. For years, integrated graphics were like those inflatable arm-flailing tube men, fun to watch, but not useful for serious gaming. Yet here we are, with a chip that can push Cyberpunk 2077 and Spider-Man 2 at respectable settings. That’s wild.

Of course, the RTX 4060 still flexes harder, especially when ray tracing enters the chat. Nvidia’s DLSS also makes a big difference, delivering smoother frames and better visuals. But credit where it’s due. AMD has raised the bar for what an “iGPU” can do. For portable gaming, or for folks who want power in a slim device without lugging a bulky laptop, this is exciting.

💬 Final Thoughts

If you’re looking purely at performance per dollar, the RTX 4060 laptop is the obvious choice you could literally buy two or three of them for the cost of one Z13. But if you value portability and want to see what the future of integrated graphics looks like, the Ryzen Max+ 395 is seriously impressive. This feels less like AMD trying to replace dGPUs outright and more like them saying, “Hey, don’t underestimate us anymore.”

Does iGPU Beat dGPU? Ryzen Max+ 395 vs RTX 4060 in 25 Games

The big question here is simple: can AMD’s new super-charged integrated graphics (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) actually beat Nvidia’s trusty dedicated GPU, the RTX 4060? Sounds almost ridiculous, right? For years, “integrated graphics” was basically a polite way of saying, “this laptop can maybe handle Solitaire.” But AMD has decided to crash the party with a chip that claims to run modern AAA games smoothly inside a thin 13-inch tablet, no less. The video I watched dives into 25 games tested at both 1080p and 1440p to see if AMD’s iGPU can truly hold its own against a mid-tier dGPU like the 4060. I have always known NVIDIA for their excellent graphics (I'm on team NVIDIA, which is the RTX 4060).

📝 Video Summary

• Setup: AMD’s Ryzen Max+ 395 (inside ASUS Flow Z13) vs Nvidia RTX 4060 (inside Lenovo Legion Slim 5).
• CPU edge: The Z13’s Zen 5 CPU is way ahead of the Legion’s older Zen 4, 60% better multicore, 10% better single core.
• Power limits: RTX 4060 tested at 100W, Z13’s GPU at 75–93W. Jarrod kept it realistic, no “fake fairness.”
• VRAM allocation: AMD’s iGPU can borrow system RAM as VRAM. Testing at 8GB vs 16GB VRAM showed little difference.
  
  VRAM (Video RAM) is basically the graphics card’s own memory space, dedicated to handling visuals. Unlike your computer’s normal RAM that’s shared across everything, VRAM is reserved only for storing images, textures, and details needed to render what you see on screen. In simple terms, it’s like giving your graphics card its own private desk, bigger desks (more VRAM) mean it can handle more detail at once, while smaller desks (less VRAM) mean it has to shuffle things around, which can slow things down.

Game Performances

• Alan Wake 2: AMD sneaks ahead (6 to 8% faster) at 1080p/1440p, though margins are tiny (around 3 FPS). Ray tracing flips the script. Nvidia wins at 1080p, AMD reclaims a narrow win at 1440p.
• Cyberpunk 2077: Dead even at 1080p, AMD has smoother lows at 1440p. But with RT Ultra, 4060 crushes with a 31% lead.
• Spider-Man 2: Biggest surprise — AMD wins in average FPS, but Nvidia feels smoother and looks better thanks to DLSS.
• Stalker 2 & Black Myth: Wukong: Nvidia dominates here, with gaps as wide as 29% at 1080p. Ray tracing especially widens the lead.

💡 Takeaway

In plain English, this means Nvidia’s 4060 is still the more reliable choice for smooth, consistent gaming, especially when fancy graphics like ray tracing are turned on (as I predicted that NVIDIA would win). AMD’s chip, though surprisingly strong for something built into a laptop, only really wins a few niche battles and often falls short in heavy, graphics demanding games.

💭 My Thoughts

Honestly, I didn’t expect AMD’s iGPU to hold its ground this well. For years, integrated graphics were like those inflatable arm-flailing tube men, fun to watch, but not useful for serious gaming. Yet here we are, with a chip that can push Cyberpunk 2077 and Spider-Man 2 at respectable settings. That’s wild.

Of course, the RTX 4060 still flexes harder, especially when ray tracing enters the chat. Nvidia’s DLSS also makes a big difference, delivering smoother frames and better visuals. But credit where it’s due. AMD has raised the bar for what an “iGPU” can do. For portable gaming, or for folks who want power in a slim device without lugging a bulky laptop, this is exciting.

💬 Final Thoughts

If you’re looking purely at performance per dollar, the RTX 4060 laptop is the obvious choice you could literally buy two or three of them for the cost of one Z13. But if you value portability and want to see what the future of integrated graphics looks like, the Ryzen Max+ 395 is seriously impressive. This feels less like AMD trying to replace dGPUs outright and more like them saying, “Hey, don’t underestimate us anymore.”

ASUS Zephyrus G14 vs G16 (2025) - Top 10 Differences!

Choosing between the ASUS Zephyrus G14 and Zephyrus G16 in 2025 is sort of choosing between pizza sizes. The small one's easy to carry around, the big one is more satisfying, and in actuality you'll find yourself justifying either one. The video I watched goes over the top 10 differences between these two laptops, and it really is a battle between portability and screen space. If you have been considering either of those models and have not been able to decide, this breakdown should clear things up (or at least make you laugh while worrying about the price).

📝 Video Summary

Here are the main takeaways from the video:

Portability:

• The G14 is smaller, lighter, and overall easier to carry around daily.
• The G16, while bigger, is surprisingly slim and light compared to other 16-inch laptops.

Screen:

• Both use OLED panels with rich colors and deep blacks.
• The G16’s larger 16″ display is more immersive and has double the refresh rate.
• The G14’s higher resolution can impact FPS since it demands more GPU power. (but that means your GPU will sweat harder to keep up.)

Upgradability:

• RAM is soldered on both models (non-upgradable).
• G16 has two M.2 SSD slots for storage expansion; G14 only has one.

Wi-Fi and Ports:

• The G16 has a stronger Wi-Fi card and a full-size SD card slot.
• The G14 uses MicroSD instead but still offers solid Wi-Fi speeds.

Thermals and Noise:

• The G14 runs hotter, especially at the keyboard under load. (not cool!)
• Fan noise is similar, though the G14 tends to be slightly louder.

Performance:

• Both tested with RTX 5070 Ti GPUs; performance differences were minor.
• G14 is AMD-only, while G16 offers Intel or AMD options.
• G14’s AMD chip was better in multicore; G16’s Intel chip was faster in single core.

Battery Life:

• G14 has a 73Wh battery, G16 has a 90Wh.
• G16 lasts approximately 5% longer in video playback and more or less 27% longer in gaming.
• G14 drains less when asleep, meaning fewer surprises when you open it up again.

Speakers and Input:

• Both have excellent front-facing speakers; G16’s are slightly better.
• G14’s touchpad feels more satisfying; G16’s is larger but had a loose click.
• Keyboards are similar, though G16 feels a bit “clickier.”

My Thoughts

What stood out to me is how well the G14 keeps up despite being the smaller, more portable option. Usually, compact laptops sacrifice too much, but the G14 proves it can still deliver strong performance and solid battery life. I think this makes it an excellent choice for students, travelers, or anyone who values mobility but doesn’t want to compromise too much on gaming power. However, one feature I do not like about the G14 is the fact that under load the keyboard would feel hot (imagine I have to type 20 pages of a document, in between I’d have to dip my hands in water?)

Still, I get why the content creator leaned toward the G16. Bigger screen = less squinting and more immersion. And let’s be real: once you go big, it’s hard to go back (laptops included). The added storage slot and bigger battery don’t hurt either. I’ll pick the G16 anyway.

💬 Final Thoughts

If your life does scream mobility first, the G14 is a no-brainer. But if you're okay with putting on some extra heft and you'd adore that larger screen and additional longevity, the G16's worth the investment. For me? I'd go for the G16. I already hunch over my laptop to start with. I don't need a smaller screen informing my future chiropractor to be prepared for even more money.

ASUS Zephyrus G14 vs G16 (2025) - Top 10 Differences!

Choosing between the ASUS Zephyrus G14 and Zephyrus G16 in 2025 is sort of choosing between pizza sizes. The small one's easy to carry around, the big one is more satisfying, and in actuality you'll find yourself justifying either one. The video I watched goes over the top 10 differences between these two laptops, and it really is a battle between portability and screen space. If you have been considering either of those models and have not been able to decide, this breakdown should clear things up (or at least make you laugh while worrying about the price).

📝 Video Summary

Here are the main takeaways from the video:

Portability:

• The G14 is smaller, lighter, and overall easier to carry around daily.
• The G16, while bigger, is surprisingly slim and light compared to other 16-inch laptops.

Screen:

• Both use OLED panels with rich colors and deep blacks.
• The G16’s larger 16″ display is more immersive and has double the refresh rate.
• The G14’s higher resolution can impact FPS since it demands more GPU power. (but that means your GPU will sweat harder to keep up.)

Upgradability:

• RAM is soldered on both models (non-upgradable).
• G16 has two M.2 SSD slots for storage expansion; G14 only has one.

Wi-Fi and Ports:

• The G16 has a stronger Wi-Fi card and a full-size SD card slot.
• The G14 uses MicroSD instead but still offers solid Wi-Fi speeds.

Thermals and Noise:

• The G14 runs hotter, especially at the keyboard under load. (not cool!)
• Fan noise is similar, though the G14 tends to be slightly louder.

Performance:

• Both tested with RTX 5070 Ti GPUs; performance differences were minor.
• G14 is AMD-only, while G16 offers Intel or AMD options.
• G14’s AMD chip was better in multicore; G16’s Intel chip was faster in single core.

Battery Life:

• G14 has a 73Wh battery, G16 has a 90Wh.
• G16 lasts approximately 5% longer in video playback and more or less 27% longer in gaming.
• G14 drains less when asleep, meaning fewer surprises when you open it up again.

Speakers and Input:

• Both have excellent front-facing speakers; G16’s are slightly better.
• G14’s touchpad feels more satisfying; G16’s is larger but had a loose click.
• Keyboards are similar, though G16 feels a bit “clickier.”

My Thoughts

What stood out to me is how well the G14 keeps up despite being the smaller, more portable option. Usually, compact laptops sacrifice too much, but the G14 proves it can still deliver strong performance and solid battery life. I think this makes it an excellent choice for students, travelers, or anyone who values mobility but doesn’t want to compromise too much on gaming power. However, one feature I do not like about the G14 is the fact that under load the keyboard would feel hot (imagine I have to type 20 pages of a document, in between I’d have to dip my hands in water?)

Still, I get why the content creator leaned toward the G16. Bigger screen = less squinting and more immersion. And let’s be real: once you go big, it’s hard to go back (laptops included). The added storage slot and bigger battery don’t hurt either. I’ll pick the G16 anyway.

💬 Final Thoughts

If your life does scream mobility first, the G14 is a no-brainer. But if you're okay with putting on some extra heft and you'd adore that larger screen and additional longevity, the G16's worth the investment. For me? I'd go for the G16. I already hunch over my laptop to start with. I don't need a smaller screen informing my future chiropractor to be prepared for even more money.